SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 8511

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J
Vikash Kumar Dhangar – Appellant
Versus
Nayan Govindani – Respondent
ACQA No. 108 of 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rekhraj Baghel
For the Respondents: Ms. Anuradha Jain, PL No.2/State

Victims have the right to appeal acquittals under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C., and limitation is not enforced if the appeal is filed timely.

Headnote:This Acquittal Appeal seeks reversal of the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, from the Judicial Magistrate. Based on recent Supreme Court ruling, the Appellant is granted liberty to appeal within 45 days. The court affirms that the new appeal should not be hindered by the limitation period. RESULT: The Appeal is disposed of.

... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Rekhraj Baghel, Advocate For Respondent : Ms. Anuradha Jain, PL No.2/State Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Judgment On Board

31/07/2025

1. This Acquittal Appeal has been preferred under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 29.01.2018 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baloda Bazar in Criminal Complaint Case No.1385/2016, whereby, the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 .

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that recently in the judgment dated 08.04.2025 rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. , 2025 INSC 804, right to file appeal under proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C . was discussed and it was held that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused and such appeal shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the order of conviction of such Court. He submits that the Appeal may be disposed of reserving liberty so as to avail the said remedy.

3. Counsel for the other side would not oppose the aforesaid prayer.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission and considering the law declared in the matter of Celestium Financial (supra), this Appeal stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the appellant to file an appeal within a period of 45 days from this order before the appropriate Court, in accordance with law. It is further made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned Court within the time given by this Court, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the same in accordance with law.

5. Registry shall return the certified copy of the judgment and relevant documents to counsel for the appellant after retaining its photocopy.

6. Registry shall send back the record to the concerned Court.

7. Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top