IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Arvind Kumar Verma, J
Shakuntala W/o Shobharam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for forest rights rejected. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. state counsel opposes relief. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court identified violations of due process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court disposed of the writ petition. (Para 13) |
Order on Board
1. With the consent of both the respective parties, the matter is heard finally.
226 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by illegal arbitrary and unreasonable act of respondent authorities, that ancestors of petitioner are in possession of land before 1940 when village Rampur was in gram panchayat Puri, but after formation of new gram panchayat Rampur in the year 2019-20, land in possession of petitioner came under gram panchayat Rampur, all the villagers in gram panchayat belong to Schedule Tribes and petitioner’s family residing there belongs to Scheduled Caste, because of which villagers have been out casted. That the claim of forest right patta has been rejected by gram panchayat Rampur without considering the documentary evidence that the petitioner is residing and cultivating in the land for more than 85 years and Sub Divisional Level Committee, has passed the order in one line without assigning any reas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.