Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Smt. Sukdi Poyam W/o Late Fangu – Appellant
Versus
Balram Baghel S/o Chingduram Baghel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondents denied allegations and insurance claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. compensation recalculated based on legal precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 3. court assessed the evidence and arguments presented. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. determination of income based on notional assessment leading to a revised compensation. (Para 14) |
| 5. final order on enhancement of compensation and respective allocations. (Para 15) |
For Appellants : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Animesh Pathak, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu PAWAN KUMAR Order On Board JHA
13/06/2025 Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA
1. Appellants have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking enhancement of compensation, challenging the award dated 02.05.2019 passed by Learned Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh (for short “Claims Tribunal”) in Claim Case No. 227/2018, whereby learned Claims Tribunal allowed the application filed under Section 166 , 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “Act of 1988”) in part and awarded total sum of ₹ 8,01,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
