Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, J
Chandraprakash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Priya Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case involves a dispute over the interim maintenance amount awarded by the family court. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. the court found no illegalities in the family court's decision, ruling to uphold the maintenance amount awarded. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. the court dismissed the appeal, ensuring the trial progresses expeditiously. (Para 6) |
Order on Board
20/06/ 202 5 Heard.
1. The present revision has been filed under Section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the impugned order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the learned Family Court, Balodabazar-Bhatapra, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) in Misc. Cri. Case No. 188/2024, wherein amount of Rs. 10,000/- interim maintenance has been granted on an application filed by the respondents herein under Section
144 of BNSS, 2023 .
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- granted by the learned Family Court is on the higher side. It is further contended that the applicant is a very small pandit of a temple, but the respondent, wife, without any ground, claimed Rs. 43,000/- per month. He also submits that the applicant and respondents are presently living in the same hous
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
