Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Laxmi Kumar Dahariya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court hears both parties in the petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. accusations of false implications require factual scrutiny. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial must proceed to determine validity of charges. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. petition is dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 9) |
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
24.06.2025
1. Heard Mr. Sachin Nidhi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 / State.
2. The petitioner has filed this petition with following prayer:
“i) F.I.R. No. 263/2024 dated 28.10.2024, registered at Police Station- Hardibazar, District- Korba (C.G.) for the offence U/s- 74, 331(5) of BNS, Corresponding Section 354 , 455 of I.P.C.
ii) Chargesheet No.263/2024 dated 15.12.2024 filed before the Court of Learned JMFC, Pali, District- Korba (C.g.), for the offence U/s-74, 331(5) of BNS, Corresponding Section 354 , 455 of I.P.C. arising out of crime no.263/2024.
Iii) The Cognizance order dated 23.12.2024 taken b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
