IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
Smt. Karuna Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Amarjeet Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims for maintenance must be substantiated with corroborative evidence. (Para 8) |
| 2. court dismissed the revision for lack of merit. (Para 9) |
Order on Board
24 /06/2025
1. Heard Mr. Jitendra Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent.
2. The applicant has filed this criminal revision against the order dated 22.02.2017 passed by learned First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg, District – Durg (C.G.) in MJC No.92/2017, whereby the learned Family Court has rejected the application under Section 125 CrPC filed by the applicant.
3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this revision are that the applicant has filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. before the Family Court alleging therein that the marriage between the respondent / husband and the applicant / wife was solemnized on 20.05.2013 as per Hindu Custom. Unfortunately, soon after their marriage, the applicant was subjected to cruelty, mental and physical abuse by the respondent on account of demand of dowry . The cruelty continued for near about a year, and through all that period the applicant remained calm and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.