Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Arvind Kumar Verma, J
Satish Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought and allegations of interference. (Para 2) |
| 2. challenge to suspension order on administrative grounds. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court finds alternative remedy and civil nature. (Para 5 , 6) |
Order on Board
27/06/2025
1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):-
“(I) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ commanding and directing the respondents authority to produce all relevant records for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ restraining the respondents in demolishing / removing of the fencing from petitioner land forcefully.
(iii) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Tahsildar Keshkal to decide the proceedings pending before him since 23.02.2023 under Section
250 of CGLRC.
(iv) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ commanding and directed the respondents not to disturb the possession of petitioner till the order of competent authority.
(v) Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.
2. Learned counsel for the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
