Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Maaujuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common factual matrix leads to multiple appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evidence collected formed the basis of the prosecution case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defendant's innocence and lack of evidence argued. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court confirms death as homicidal based on medical evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. confessions to police deemed inadmissible. (Para 21 , 22 , 24 , 30) |
| 6. court allows appeals due to insufficient evidence. (Para 32 , 33) |
--- Respondent For Appellant (CRA 707/2025) : Ms. Sonia Kuldeep, Advocate For Appellant (CRA 1405/2025) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble S hri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
2 8 . 0 7 .202 5
1. Since the above-captioned appeals arise out of a common factual matrix and common impugned judgment, this Court is disposing of the same by a common judgment.
2. This criminal appeals under Section 415(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) are directed against the impunged judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.07.2024 passed by learned Additio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
