Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Arvind Kumar Verma, J
Nirmal Kumar Golchha – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shobha Kotadiya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging tehsildar's pathway allowance (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. pending appeal against tehsildar's order (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court directions for expeditious appeal resolution (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's opinion remains neutral on case merits (Para 8) |
Order on Board
30/07/2025
1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the impugned order dated Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH ASHUTOSH MISHRA MISHRA Date:
2025.08.01 +0530
02/07/2025 passed by the Tehsildar, Mungeli in Case No.A-13/2024- 25, whereby the application of Respondents No.1 & 2 for providing easementry pathway from the petitioner’s private land is allowed.
2. The brief facts of this case are projected by the petitioner are that the land in question is situated at Village Mungeli, Man-2, Patwari Halka No.19, RIC Mungeli Urban, Tehsil and District Mungeli, C.G. bearing Khasra No.562/7, area 0.0950 Hectares out of which 9x140 sq. feet land is the subject matter of this petition. It is the further case of the petitioner that petitioner and husband of Respondent No.1 & father of Respondent No.2 had purchased 0.63 acres of land Part of Khasra No.562 from Nandram and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
