Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sachin Singh Rajput, J
HIFZURRAHMAN ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Singh Sidar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of appeal and rights of complainant (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for appeal and respondent's position (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations and final decision (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
... Respondent For Appellant : Mr. Rahul Pathak on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Judgment on Board
07/08/2025
1. This appeal under section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment dated
21.12.2022 passed by the J.M.F.C., Sarangarh District – Raigarh (C.G.) in complaint case no. 06/2018 acquitting the respondent/accused of the charge under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short the “Act of 1881”). Appeal was filed along-with an application under section 378(4) of the Cr.P.C. for grant of leave to appeal against the impugned judgment. The said application was allowed by this Court on
04.09.2024.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though leave to appeal under section
378(4) of the Cr.P.C. has been granted by this Court, recently the Supreme Court has delivered a judgment in the matter of M/s. Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. r
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
