SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9816

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
Ayush Jethani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Incharge City Kotwali, Raipur – Respondent
MCRC No. 5560 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Mr. Sudeep Johri
For the Respondents: Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava

The court denied bail due to serious involvement of applicants in cybercrime as evidence indicated their account use for laundering funds from fraud.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Bail application for applicants charged with serious cybercrime offenses under BNS - Evidence revealed involvement in laundering funds from cyber fraud through mule accounts. (Paras 2, 6)

(B) Serious offenses - The court must evaluate the nature and gravity of the alleged crimes and the evidence regarding guilt before granting bail. (Paras 3, 6)

Facts of the case:
The applicants were arrested in connection with cybercrime related to fraudulent transactions through bank accounts and claimed that they were falsely implicated despite asserting participation in the investigation.

Findings of Court:
The nature of the offense suggests serious involvement in a cybercrime scheme and therefore bail is denied.

Issues: Whether the applicants' involvement in the crime warrants bail given the seriousness of the charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence presented prima facie suggests serious involvement in cyber fraud, and therefore the applicants are not suitable for bail at this stage.

Result: Bail applications rejected.

Table of Content
1. bail application details and prosecution case outline. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defense argues against involvement in crime. (Para 4)
3. court reviews evidence and decides on bail. (Para 5)
4. court's reasoning for rejecting bail application. (Para 7)
5. final directive on trial court proceedings. (Para 8)

Order on Board

16/07/2025

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS S ’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 45/2025 registered at Police Station City Kotwali, Raipur, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 317 (2), 317(4) and 317(5) and 111 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short ‘ BNS ’).

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the Kotwali Raipur police station registered a First Information Report (FIR) No. 45/25 under Sections 317 (2), 317(4), 317(5), and 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ) on the basis of a letter from the Superintendent of Police, Cyber Police Station, Raipur, dated 22.03.2025. The FIR was lodged pursuant to instructions from the Additional Director General of Police (Technology Services), Police Headquarters, Raipur, regarding statutory action against mule account holders. The investigation revealed that 41 bank accounts in Kotak Mahindra Bank, Raipur, with IFSC codes kkbk0006407, kkbk0006402, and kkbk0006408, were used to deposit Rs.18,96,851 obtained through cyber fraud. The account holders/promoters used these accounts to utilize the funds obtained through cyber fraud. It was found that the accounts were used to deposit the fraudulently earned amount between 01.01.2024, and 11.01.2025. The investigation revealed that the account holders/promoters knowingly used these accounts to launder money obtained through cyber fraud. The Cyber Range, Raipur, registered a case (Crime No. 45/2025) under Sections 317 (2), 317(4), 317(5), and 111 of the BNS . After investigation, a charge sheet was filed. During the investigation, the accused, Ayush Jethani and Neelam Jethani, were arrested on 26.03.2025, and were produced before the court and sent to judicial custody. Hence, the bail application.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in offence in question. He further submits that the applicants were noticed by the Cyber Range Raipur on March 26, 2025, regarding their bank accounts and mobile numbers used in Kotak Mahindra Bank. They appeared before the authorities and participated in the investigation. Notices under Section 94 BNSS were served, and their memorandum statements were recorded. The applicants stated they were unaware of the deposits of Rs.8,60,272 and Rs.7,30,446 in their accounts (nos. 4949984490 and 5049034696). One applicant claimed to be a graduate, running a shop, and earning Rs.5-10 lakhs per year. He alleged that he opened the account in January 2024 and later joined a business opportunity through Instagram, following directions from a business influencer, which led to the transactions in question. He denied committing any crime. Furthermore, applicant No. 2, a 26-year-old unmarried woman and teacher at KPS School Raipur, claimed to have opened a Kotak Mahindra Bank account (no. 5049034696) on January 20, 2024, to earn extra income through online digital marketing. She received a message from someone named Deepak Kumar about a job opportunity in afÏliate marketing, which offered a 5% commission. She joined, believing it was a legitimate way to earn extra income. Despite having no motive to commit a crime, she was arrested on March 26, 2025, for allegedly providing a mule account for concealing and disposing of stolen property, and was sent to jail custody. He also submits that the applicants ware young entrepreneur and teacher, they have no motive of committing any crimes, however, one co-accused, namely, Mayank Dhi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top