M/s Kripa Road Lines Pvt Ltd A Registered Partnership Firm, Having Its Office At Near, S B I, Sarkanda Branch, Bilaspur, C.G., Through One Of Its Partner- Mr. Shrawan Kumar Soni vs M/s National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd Sipat Super Thermal Power Project At Ujjwal Nagar, Sipat, District- Bilaspur, C.G.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
M/s Kripa Road Lines Pvt Ltd A Registered Partnership Firm, Having Its Office At Near, S B I, Sarkanda Branch, Bilaspur, C.G., Through One Of Its Partner- Mr. Shrawan Kumar Soni – Appellant
Versus
M/s National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd Sipat Super Thermal Power Project At Ujjwal Nagar, Sipat, District- Bilaspur, C.G. – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Senior Advocate, Mr. Aseem Bhagwat Gopal
For the Respondents:Dr. Nirmal Shukla, Senior Advocate, Mr. Anuroop Panda

Table of Content
1. petition for relief and quashing of order. (Para 2)
2. background of arbitration agreement and ensuing disputes. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent's claims and initiation of perjury proceedings. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments regarding the claim and liability. (Para 7 , 8)
5. decision to set aside perjury proceedings based on lack of evidence. (Para 13 , 14)

Order On Board

04-08-2025

1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs:-

10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set-aside the impugned Order dated 15.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Commercial Court (District Judge Level), Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) in Execution Case no. 05/2018 and any consequential proceeding arising therefrom.

10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate.

2) Facts of the present case are that the parties herein entered into an agreement for loading and transportation of coal, and there was a dispute with regard to the demand of Rs. 27 lakhs by the respondent. Respondent [award-holder] invoked arbitration clause and filed a claim before the Sole Arbitrator an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document