Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Bibhu Datta Guru, J
Chatrasaal Katiyar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir involves transaction related to extortion. (Para 2) |
| 2. dispute over evidence of transaction validity. (Para 3) |
| 3. involvement is prima facie established through transactions. (Para 4) |
| 4. no grounds found to dismiss fir. (Para 5) |
| 5. petition dismissed. (Para 6) |
Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice
05 .08 .2025
1. In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:-
“It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the application by quashing the F.I.R. No. 143/2025 lodged by the respondent no. 2 dated
03.06.2025 at P.S. Gandai u/s 318(4), 319(2), 308(2) & 308(5) of B.N.S. sections 66(D) & 67(a) of I.T. Act on part of the present applicant, in the interest of justice.”
2. (A) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of a stationary shop at Devbramhpur, District Kanpur, U.P. and he runs his shop with the help of his younger brother. The respondent No. 2 has filed a written complaint before the P.S. Gandai, District Khairagarh Chhuikhadaan Gandai (C.G.) against the unknown person with an allegation that she has received fraud calls from the phone numbers 6386808378, 9305865167, 9208508
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
