Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shri Ramesh Sinha, CJ
Smt. Mahima Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shri Pratik Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts concerning marriage, maintenance request, and respondent's income. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding adequacy of maintenance based on lifestyle. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's examination of the family court's ruling. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court found no merit to interfere with lower court's findings. (Para 10) |
Order on Board
11.08.2025
1. None appeared on behalf of the respondent to press this revision, when the matter is called for hearing today.
2. Heard Mr. Sunil Verma, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant.
3. The present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the enhance the amount of maintenance which is granted by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, (C.G.) in Criminal M.C.C. No. 819/2023 and awarded a maintenance in sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as claimed before the Family Court, in the interest of justice.”
4. Facts of the case are that the applicant has filed an application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of maintenance of Rs. 2,00,000/- per month from the respondent/husband. It is an admitted fact that the applicant and the respondent got ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
