Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
Pushpendra Kumar Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
Diwakar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court reviews the petition challenging a trial court's decision. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the need for clarity on land boundaries warrants judicial investigation. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court emphasizes the appointment of a local commissioner in boundary disputes. (Para 9 , 10) |
Order on Board
14/08/2025
1. The plaintiff has filed this petition assailing the order dated
3.8.2022 passed in Civil Suit No.18A/2019 by the learned Civil Judge Class I, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, whereby an application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC has been rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff would submit that the petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and vacant possession of the suit property after demolition of the house constructed over the suit land. He would further [k contend that the petitioner is owner of Survey No.711/3 ad- measuring area 322 square metres situated at Nazul Sheet No.27C, Block No.86, Sakti, Tahsil Sakti. He would contend that the respondents/defendants started raising construction over the suit land and, therefore, the suit was filed. He would further contend that during pendency of the suit, an appl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
