SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 451

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Raza @ Raja Pathan And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA/454/2015



AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRA No. 454 of 2015

1. Raza @ Raja Pathan S/o Yunus Pathan Aged About 28 Years R/o Mangali Bazaar Gourela P.S. Gaurela District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sharavan Sonker S/o Ramsanjeevan Sonkar Aged About 23 Years

3. Lalla Sonker S/o Kishore Sonker Aged About 21 Years Both above 2 and 3 R/o Samta Nagar Gaurela P.S. Gaurela, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ----Appellants Versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Appellant : Shri Rajesh Jain, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, PL for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order On Board

10/08/2018

1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 23.02.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pendra Road, District Bilaspur in S.T. No.38/2012 whereby the appellant No.1 Raza @ Raja Pathan has been convicted under Sections 307/149 (twice), 148/149 & 506 (Part - 2) IPC & under Sections 25 (1) (1- B) (A) and 27 (2) of Arms Act and has been sentenced for 10 years RI under Section 307/149 IPC and a fine of Rs.500/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 2-2 months RI was ordered for, he has further been sentenced to 1 year R.I. under Section 148/149 IPC and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month RI was ordered for, further has been sentenced to 1 year R.I. under Section 506 (part -2) IPC and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month R.I. was ordered for, he has been sentenced to 1 years R.I. under Section 25 (1) (1-B) (A) of Arms Act and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month R.I. was ordered for and lastly the appellant No.1 has been sentenced to 7 years R.I. under Section 27 (2) of Arms Act and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month R.I. was ordered for. The appellants No.2 & 3 Sharavan Sonker and Lalla Sonker have been convicted under Sections 307/149 (twice), 148/149 & 506 (Part - 2) IPC and both of them have been sentenced for 10 years RI under Section 307/149 IPC and a fine of Rs.500/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 2-2 months RI was ordered for and have further been sentenced to 1 year R.I. under Section 148/149 IPC and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month RI was ordered for and lastly they have been sentenced to 1 year R.I. under Section 506 (part -2) IPC and fine of Rs.100/- and in absence of payment of fine, additional 1 month R.I. was ordered for.

2. Brief facts of this case are that on 05.06.2012, the complainant Rakesh Gupta made a report that on 04.06.2012 at about 9 pm while he was at his Dhaba, at that time Sharavan Sonker (A2) and his friends had their meal. Subsequently, at the time of payment, they entered into altercation with the manager namely Peetamber. The complainant thereafter intervened and Shravan Sonker (A2) entered into altercation and gave threat that he will teach him a lesson. Subsequently, at about 11.30 pm Sharavan Sonker (A2), Raza @ Raja Pathan (A1), one Ravi, Lalla Sonker (A3), Nahid Ansari and Ravindra @ Ravi Banjara came back armed with Pistol, Gupti, sword and club and entered into the Dhaba. Thereafter with the allegation that he has taken more money caught hold of the complainant and Raza @ Raja Pathan (A1) took out a pistol and shot fire to the complainant which he tried to avert but he sustained bullet injury on his back. At that time, Sharavan Sonker and Lalla also started assaulting by way of Gupti and sword. Peetamber, the manager of the Dhaba was also assaulted. Thereafter, the appellants fled away.

3. The dehatinalisi was made by Ex. P-12 and thereafter the First Information Report was lodged vide Ex. P-22. Injured Rakesh Gupta and Peetamber were rushed to hospital and were subjected to medical examination and were admitted to the hospital. Subsequently, the appellants/accused were arrested and the air gun pistol, one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top