Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ
DEWANGAN Daya Kashyap – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Kunti Kashyap – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for maintenance based on financial need. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. disputed claims and alleged abusive behavior. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial review of maintenance award. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's affirmation of family court's ruling. (Para 10) |
Order on Board
09.09.2025
1. Heard Mr. Vikas A. Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicant.
Also heard Mr. Punit Ruparel, learned counsel for the non-
applicants.
2. By way of this revision, the applicant has prayed for following relief:
“It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call for the records of the Court below for hearing arguments and be pleased to allow this revision and quash the order of maintenance passed by the learned Family Court in the interest of justice.”
3. Brief facts of the case are that the non-applicants filed a case under Section 125 Cr.P.C . seeking grant of maintenance. The Non- applicant No. 1 submitted that she was married to the applicant in May 2015 according to their customary rites, and thereafter, they resided peacefully at her husband’s house in Village Titirgaon. It was further submitted that in the year 2016, when she was pregnant, the applicant beat her and expelled her from t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
