Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rajani Dubey, Amitendra Kishore Prasad, JJ
Abhaynarayan Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Laliteshwar Shrivastava (Deleted) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of embezzlement by respondents under a public welfare scheme. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's examination of the public servant definition and the trial court's dismissal rationale. (Para 3 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. arguments regarding applicability of the prevention of corruption act. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. final decision on the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 16) |
Per, Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.
1. This revision petition under Section 397/401 of the Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the complainant against the order dated 24.08.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1988 , (for short, ‘the Act, 1988’) Surguja at Ambikapur in Miscellaneous Case No. unregistered/2015, whereby the complaint filed by the applicant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 7 , 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Act, 1988 and Sections 409 , 417, 420, 423, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’) was dismissed.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the complainant/applicant alleged that the respondents/non- applicants, under the guise of running social service organizations, committed a serious criminal offence by embezzling more
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
