##PAGE1##

2025:CGHC:54576-DB NAFR JYOTI SHARMA JYOTI SHARMA HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Date: 2025.11.10 16:16:30 +0530 WPC No. 4702 of 2025 Dr. Samriddhi Dubey D/o Shri Sandeep Dubey Aged About 25 Years R/o Om Zone Colony, Shubham Vihar, Mangala, Bilaspur, District :

Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s)

versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002

2. The Director Medical Education, Directorate Of Medical Education, Swasthya Bhawan, Sector 19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002.

3. The Commissioner Medical Education, Directorate Of Medical Education, Swasthya Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Sector 19, North Block, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492002.

4. The National Commission Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Through Its Director, Pocket- 14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-1 New Delhi-

110077

5. The Director General Directorate General Of Health Services, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Government Of India, Room Number 354, D.G.H.S. Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, Delhi- 110011

6. The National Board Of Examinations In Medical Sciences Through Is Secretary / Director, Medical Enclave, Ansari Nagar Ring Road, New Delhi- 110029 ... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Counsel assisted by Sandeep Dubey and Ms. Jyoti Chandravanshi, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Advocate General along with Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Aniruddh Singh on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj K. Wankhede, Advocate For Respondent No. 5 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

10/11/2025

1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Shrivastava, Senior Counsel assisted by Sandeep Dubey and Ms. Jyoti Chandravanshi, Advocate learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, learned Advocate General along with Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. Also heard Mr. Aniruddh Singh on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj K. Wankhede, Advocate for respondent No. 4 and Ms. Anmol Sharma, CGC for respondent No. 5 and Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Advocate for respondent No. 6.

2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:-

“10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction/directions, writ/writs in the nature of certiorari and declare the Rule 11(a) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2021 ultra virus / unconstitutional being voilative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 10.2 That, Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction/directions, writ/writs in the nature of certiorari and declare the part of Rule 11(b) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2021 to the extent "(ख) उपरो(cid:5)क्त उप-नि(cid:9)यम (क) म(cid:13) उल्ले(cid:16)खिखत सभी(cid:20) प(cid:21)्ቔ अभ्यቕኌ(cid:26)(cid:27)य(cid:28) क(cid:5) ्ቚवे(cid:16)श दि!य (cid:16)जा(cid:21)(cid:9) (cid:16)क(cid:16) उपरो(cid:21)न्त यदि! स(cid:20)ेሡ(cid:13) रिरोक्त रोह जा(cid:21)त(cid:20) ह’ त(cid:5), इ(cid:9) रिरोक्त स(cid:20)ेሡ(cid:28) परो, ऐस(cid:16) अभ्यቕኌ(cid:26)(cid:27)य(cid:28) क(cid:5) ्ቚवे(cid:16)श दि!य(cid:21) जा(cid:21)य(cid:16)गा(cid:21)।...." ultra virus / unconstitutional being voilative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction/directions, writ/writs in the nature of certiorari and direct the respondents not to discriminate between the candidates belonging to categories mentioned in the Rule 11(a) and Rule 11(b) of the Chhattisgarh Medical Post Graduate Admission Rules, 2021.

10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fi