SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2

CHHATISGARH HIGH COURT
Unknown, J
Shyama Bai Verma v. Umesh Kumar


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

Table of Content
1. facts of the accident leading to the claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. legal principles regarding joint liability under s.140. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. observations about procedural delays and prioritizing claims. (Para 7 , 8)
4. the appeal is allowed with costs. (Para 10)

1. This appeal is against the order dated 26.7.2001 passed in Claim Case No. 2 of 1999 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur, Link Court, Pendra Road whereby the application for interim award under S.140 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been rejected on the ground that truck driver / owner have not been impleaded as party respondent.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that on 14.6.1998 the husband of appellant No. 1, namely, Suresh Verma along with his relatives was travelling in a jeep bearing No. MP 26 E 0781 belonging to the respondent No. 1 and insured by respondent No. 3. The said vehicle met with an accident on the way near village Keonchi on account of head - on collision with an unidentified truck coming from the opposite direction. The jeep was badly damaged and Suresh Verma received serious head injuries and ultimately succumbed to the injuries on 19.6.1996. The offending truck fled from the s

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top