Back
CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A. P. Singh, J
Sanjeev Kumar Agarwal (Dr.) v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought admission to vacant seat based on established state rules. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. eligibility criteria and procedural mishaps in seat allocation highlighted. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. the strict adherence to rules governing seat changes forbidding mid-session discretion. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. supreme court's decisions affirmed limits on admission changes. (Para 19) |
| 5. judgment resulted in dismissal of the petition, affirming previous admissions. (Para 21) |
1. The petitioner who is a student of postgraduate Medical course (Anaesthesia) of Medical College, Raipur and pursing his post graduation studies in that college has preferred this writ petition under Art. 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction that to direct the respondents to give admission to the petitioner in MS (General Surgery) against a seat which is lying vacant since beginning.
2. The petitioner's petition is that the respondent No. 1 State of Chhattisgarh made Chhattisgarh Medical Snatkottar Pravesh Pariksha Niyam 2002. The said rules came into force on 15-5-2002 and the aims and objects of making the Pre - P.G. Rules, 2002 were to fill the State quota seats through the S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
