Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
N.K. Chandravanshi, J
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (M/s.) v. Khatanand alias K. Anand Saraf and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ex parte judgement was contested due to non-service of adequate notice. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. issues surrounding notice service and its implications for the appeal. (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. importance of compliance with procedural rules in court proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 30) |
| 4. the requirement for defendants to have knowledge of the decree. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. judicial interpretation of 'knowledge of decree' under limitation act provisions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
1. This is an appeal directed against the order dated 29-10-2002, passed by learned IIIrd Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 19/2002, rejecting an application under Order XLI Rules 19 and 21 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Facts material for disposal of this appeal are that, the plaintiffs had filed a civil suit for possession of land bearing Khasra No. 748/2 area 0.76 acres situated at Village Tifra, District Bilaspur as also for recovery of arrears of rent of Rs. 2,175/- and damages against the defendant M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, in the Court of Civil Judge Class-1, Bilaspur. The said suit was registered as Civil Suit No. 69-A/1998. The de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
