SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 33

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Justices of Bench, J
Tamaskar V. G. v. High Court of Chhattisgarh and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellant:the petitioner appearing in person
For the Respondents: V. G. Tamaskar

1. The petitioner is an advocate practising in the High Court of Chhattisgarh and has a background of public service. He has filed this writ petition praying for quashing the designation of respondents 5 to 21 as Senior Advocates of this Court and for directing the High Court of Chhattisgarh to designate all those lawyers who had applied to be designated as Senior Advocates by issuing appropriate writ of certiorari/mandamus. The petitioner has also prayed for directing the High Court of Chhattisgarh to frame separate rules for designating the lawyers as Senior Advocates by issuing appropriate writ of mandamus.

2. The petitioner who has appeared in person submitted that a Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court has held in the case of Democratic Bar Association v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad , reported in 2001 (5) SLR 88 : (AIR 2000 All 300) that writ petition filed by Association of Advocates and the Advocates practising in the High Court of Allahabad questioning the legality of the rules for designation of Senior Advocates was maintainable. He submitted that in view of the said decision of the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court, the present writ petition by which desig




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top