SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 63

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A.P. Singh, J
Surendra Pal Singh Parihar v. State of Chhattisgarh


Table of Content
1. advocates practicing in different states under specific conditions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. conditions and provisions under the advocates act regarding practice in other states. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's decision to allow cross-state appearances with compliance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)

1. A short question involves for consideration in this petition as to whether an advocate enrolled in a different State can appear and conduct a case in the State of Chhattisgarh or not?

2. The brief facts, as stated in the petition are that this petitioner is enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. His enrolment Number is U. P. 73/1448. Two of the accused persons in Sessions Trial No. 329/2005 (State through C.B.I. v. Amit Jogi and 30 others) pending in the Court of 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Raipur, engaged the petitioner to defend their case. The recording of the evidence in the trial commenced on 13-12-2005. On 13-12-2005, the petitioner appeared in the said Court and filed his memo of appearance. The said memo was also signed by Shri J. S. Rathore, Advocate, Gwalior and Shri R. K. Tiwari, a local advocate practicing at Raipur. The petitioner then conducted the tr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top