SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 81

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
S. K. Sinha, J.
Viseshar Yadav v. Govind Swami.


Table of Content
1. defendant's appeal details and background of the suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the joint nature of property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. evidence on property ownership and partition. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's analysis on the validity of specific performance agreements. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. proof of agreement and repayment obligations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. final ruling by the court. (Para 16)

1. This is the defendant's first appeal filed u/S. 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure . It arises out of the judgement and decree dated 14-10-1993 passed by second Addl. District Judge, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No. 3-A/1990. By the said judgement and decree, the trial Court decreed the suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 30-5-1988.

2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the aforesaid agreement dated 30-5-1988 allegedly entered into between the plaintiff and defendant for sale of a house situated in Talapara, Bilaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 25,000/-. The plaintiff inter alia pleaded that after entering into the written agreement dated 30-5-1988 (Ex. P. 1), a sum of Rs. 5000/- was received as an advance by t
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top