Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Justices, J
Uttam Chand Luniya v. Roshanlal Verma and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim based on sale contract and injunction application. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding temporary injunction criteria and case law. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's assessment of documentation and plaintiff's preparedness. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 4. final ruling based on procedural correctness and evidentiary failures. (Para 13) |
1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. The appellant / plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the order dated 6-5-2006 passed in Civil Suit No. 2 - A / 06 by First Additional District Judge, Rajnandgaon whereby the application of the appellant / plaintiff under O.39, R.1 and R.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for grant of temporary injunction has been rejected. (Parties hereinafter shall be referred to as per their description before the trial Court).
3. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract agreement with respect to the suit land with the averments that plaintiff and defendant No. 1 entered into a contract agreement dated 15-7-2003 to sell the suit land bearing Khasra No. 218/1, area 1.82 acers situated at village Sahaspur, for a consideration of Rs. 76,000/-. A subsequen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
