Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
XYZ, J
Bhawna Enterprises (M/s.) v. State of Chhattisgarh and Another
Headnote: Read headnote
1. Respondent No.2 for sale of Tendu leaves to be collected in the year 2007 invited tenders / bids from prospective bidders to purchase the same vide notification No. T. P. (2007) - 1 dated 6-11-2006, inter alia, on various terms and conditions. The petitioner is a proprietorship firm constituted and established to carry on the business of sale and purchase of Tendu leaves as well as other forest products. The petitioner is registered to carry on the business of sale and purchase of Tendu leaves with the State of Chhattisgarh under the provisions of Chhattisgarh Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Niyamawali, 1966. Petitioner after depositing earnest money approximately Rs. 56.00 lacs submitted tender for the first round. Similarly bidders / tenderers across the State also submitted their bids / tenders to purchase Tendu leaves. The tenders / bids submitted were opened on 12-12-2006 and the price offered by the purchasers was made public on the same date. Petitioner's bid was highest in respect of units 764, 543, 679, 756, 755, 721, 754, 716, 776, 673, 672, 542, 394, 371, 369, 368, 367
The right of tenderers is not conferred until a bid is accepted, and states can reject tenders to maximize revenue without violating legal principles.
Section 14 of Act reads as general rejection of tenders.
Tender authorities must adhere to statutory criteria and act transparently; courts will not interfere unless clear evidence of arbitrariness or malafide conduct is presented.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in matters of tender, the State has the freedom to formulate conditions and the court should exercise judicial restraint, ensuring fairness an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fairness, non-arbitrariness, and reasonableness in state actions related to tender distribution, emphasizing the state's objectiv....
Government must exercise discretion in contract awarding fairly and rationally, without arbitrary discrimination against bidders.
The Court highlighted the importance of fair play, reasonableness, and public interest in awarding contracts, and cautioned against unnecessary interference in commercial matters.
Government cannot lay down arbitrary or capricious standards or criteria, regarding choice of a person with whom it would like to deal with and move like a free roman knight, thus, has to be adhered ....
Court exercising powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India has jurisdiction to examine decision making process without even going into merits of such decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article