SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 47

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
R. Prasad, J
Ashish Sinha v. State of Chhattisgarh
Criminal Appeal | 506/2004 | Cr.A.No.562/2004 | Cr.A.No.601/2004



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Unknown
For the Respondents: Unknown

Convictions for conspiracy and robbery under specific IPC sections were challenged due to unreliable evidence and identified inconsistencies.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 392, 397 | Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(2), 27(2) - Conviction under IPC and Arms Act - Accused convicted for conspiracy and robbery; however, prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and lack of identification led to partial acquittal - Instead, conviction under S.392 IPC maintained for two appellants and under S.397 IPC for one appellant. (Paras 28, 29)

(B) Evidence - Necessity for corroboration - Court emphasized independent corroboration for police testimony to ensure credibility, confirming the importance of independent witnesses in criminal cases. (Paras 24, 26)

Facts of the case:
The prosecution charged the appellants with armed robbery of significant cash; identification by witnesses was contested, with emphasis on evidence integrity.

Findings of Court:
Conviction for charges under S.120-B and S.397 of IPC were not sustainable due to lack of evidence but conviction under S.392 IPC was upheld.

Issues: Were the identifications reliable? Was evidence sufficient to sustain conviction under Arms Act?

Ratio Decidendi: Without corroboration from independent witnesses, evidence from police lacked credibility; identification methodologies were crucial.

Result: Appeals partly allowed; convictions modified.

Table of Content
1. robbery occurred involving significant cash, with subsequent identification of the accused. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 11)
2. police verified evidence collection and identifications; however, independent testimony was lacking. (Para 15 , 21 , 25)
3. convictions were reassessed leading to partial acquittals with adjusted charges. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)

1Cr.A.No.506/2004 filed by Ashish Sinha, Cr.A.No.562/2004 filed by Vijay K. Lakra and Cr.A.No.601/2004 filed by Vijay Kumar Bariha have been preferred against the common judgment dated 13-5-2004 passed in Sessions Trial No.375/2003, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. These appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13-5-2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Korba in Sessions Trial No.375/2003, whereby and whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the accused / appellants guilty for commission of offence under S.120 - B, 397 read with S.34 of the I.P.C., S.25 (2) and 27 (2) of the Arms Act, sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay a fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year under S.120 - B and 397 read with S.34 of the IPC and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and pay a fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for three months under S.25 (2) and 27 (2) of the Arms Act.

3. The impugned judgment is challenged on the ground that without any evidence regarding identification, memorandum and seizure and eye - witness, learned trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellants in the aforesaid manner.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment as also the record of the trial Court.

5. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that Vinod Kumar Dewangan (PW 1) was posted as Clerk / Assistant Grade - II in Woman and Child Development Project, Korba, on 25-6-2003 he went to State Bank, I.T.I. Rampur Branch, Korba for withdrawal of payment of the employees of his Office along with Shyamlal Mahant (PW 2), Peon of the said Office, they received payment of Rs.4,30,351/- in the denominations of Rs.100/-, Rs.50/-, Rs.10/- and one rupee coins. He kept the said money in jute bag and resin bag. They were coming back in the bicycle which was driven by Shyamlal Mahant (PW 2) and Vinod Kumar Dewangan (PW 1) was sitting on the bicycle holding the money. When they reached near P.W.D. School they were restrained by one tall man on the pistol point, he abused them and demanded the money and also threatened to kill them. He put pistol over the head of Shyamlal and snatched the money from Vinod Kumar. Two other accused persons were standing by the side of the road on a motorcycle which was in standing position. All the three accused ran away from the spot by the motorcycle. Vinod Kumar Dewangan and Shyamlal Mahant shouted and tried to follow them, even they chased the accused persons up to some extent, but the accused persons absconded from the spot.

6. Vinod lodged the F.I.R. at Police Outpost Rampur, Korba vide Ex.P - 1 and on the basis of Ex.P - 1 numbered F.I.R. was registered vide Ex.P - 23. Statement of Vinod was recorded on the same day. During the course of investigation, appellant Vijay Bariha was taken into custody and he made disclosure statement on 1-7-2003 at about 9.15 p.m. vide Ex.P - 14 in which he has disclosed that Rs.50,000/- was kept under a pit in the land situated in backside of Ashish Sinha's house and his clothes are in a box. After digging out the land, money of Rs.50,000/- and one country made pistol were recovered at the instance of Vijay Bariha vide Ex.P - 15 and his clothes were seized vide Ex.P - 16. Appellant Ashish Sinha made disclosure statement vide Ex.P - 18 regarding Rs.1,50,000/-and his clothes that the same were kept under a pit in the land situated at backside of his house,
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top