CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Lanco Amarkantak Power Private Ltd.(M/s.) v. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the establishment of the coal supply agreement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the justification for termination. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on the interaction of public law with contractual disputes. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 16) |
| 4. court's reasoning for dismissing the writ petition. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final ruling and direction towards arbitration. (Para 22 , 23) |
1. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It proposed to establish a coal based power plant of 1200 MW capacity, in phases, near Korba in Chhattisgarh. Since in a coal based power plant, requirement of coal is a must, therefore, the petitioner approached the South Eastern Coal Fields Ltd. (for short 'SECL'), which is a subsidiary of Coal India Limited, and finally the petitioner and the SECL entered into a coal supply agreement dated 31-12-2005. The petitioner pleaded that as per condition given in clause 2.4 of the agreement it achieved financial closure for the first 300 MW Unit on 20-9-2005 and the same was informed to the respondents / SECL vide letter dated 4-2-2006. In further compliance of the conditions of the agreement, the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.