SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 104

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*T. P. Sharma, R. L. Jhanwar, JJ.
Sushma Choure v. Hetendra Kumar Borkar


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Parag Kotecha
For the Respondents: No counsel mentioned

1.By this appeal under S.19(1) of the Family Courts Act , 1984 the appellant has challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 27-2-2006 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg in Civil Suit No. 305 - A / 05 whereby and where under learned Principal Judge Family Court, Durg has declared the marriage between parties null and void under S.11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short 'the Act of 1955').

2. The judgment and decree is impugned on the ground that without any evidence of first marriage of appellant with one Rakesh Kumar Meshram Court below has declared the marriage null and void and thereby committed an illegality.

3. Facts necessary for disposal of this appeal as per pleading of the parties is, present respondent / plaintiff has pleaded in his plaint that present appellant was having illicit relation with one Rakesh Kumar Meshram resident of Abagarh Chouki and 2 abortion took place as a result of illicit relation present respondent married with Rakesh Kumar Meshram and was residing with him as a wife. She had earlier also filed one application under S.9 of the Act of 1955 for restitution of conjugal right against Rakesh Kumar Meshram and dur


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top