CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Shankarlal Bijreja v. Ashok B. Ahuja
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. aggrieved party appeals from trial court decision. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant argues time is not essence; respondent contested readiness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court assesses facts surrounding contract performance. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. time is not of the essence in immovable property transactions; appellant failed to show readiness. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court allows refund despite no explicit request. (Para 14 , 15) |
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 28th July, 2007 passed by IXth Additional District Judge (FTC), Raipur in Civil Suit No. 45 - A / 2004 dismissing the suit filed by the appellant / plaintiff for specific performance of the contract and permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents / defendants, the appellant has filed this appeal under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Facts giving rise to this appeal briefly are as follows:
i. By an agreement for sell (Ext. P1) dated 18-6-2003 entered into between the appellant as purchaser and the respondent as vender, the respondent agreed to sell the suit property comprising of Nazul Land and house No. 21/587 and 21/588 (new No. 5/587 and 5/588) Khasra Nos. 363 and 372 area about 13,00
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.