Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Wasan P. R. v. Union of India and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legitimacy of the lower court's order regarding delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's observations on limitation and condonation under the act. (Para 5 , 8 , 11 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments regarding application submission and condonation. (Para 6) |
| 4. ratio on enforcing strict limitation for arbitral award applications. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 17) |
1. Legality and propriety of the order dated 26-11-2008, passed by the District Judge, Bilaspur in MJC Case No. 117/04 is under assail in the instant petition.
2. Brief facts as projected by the petitioner are that : On 9-11-2004, the respondent / Railway moved an application under S.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act') for setting aside arbitral award dated 2-8-2010. On 22-2-2006 respondent moved an application under proviso to S.34 (3) of the Act for condonation of delay of seven days in filing application under S.34 of the Act. In the above application, it has been stated that the respondent had received the arbitral award on 10-8-2004 and thus application filed on 9-11-2004 was within limitation, but in any case, if it is found that respondent had received the arbitral award on 2-8-2004, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
