SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 68

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
R. C. Sharma, J
Baldev Soni and Another v. State of M.P.
Criminal Appeal No. 660 of 1994



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: None

The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and when witness reliability diminishes, conviction based solely on uncorroborated testimony cannot stand.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 - Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27 - Challenge to conviction for murder - Evidence held insufficient, witnesses contradicted their statements, raising doubts on the prosecution's case - A detailed examination of the evidence revealed that the conviction was based on unreliable witness testimony without corroborative evidence - Conviction and sentence dismissed for lack of credible evidence. (Paras 8, 10, 11, 20, 34).

(B) Evidence Act, 1872 - Discloser statement - Absence of signature - The Supreme Court has cautioned that absence of signature on disclosure statement, while not automatically fatal, raises questions regarding authenticity - In the current case, the prosecution's narrative relies on the discloser statement and its supporting evidence, which was rendered unreliable. (Paras 10, 24, 32).

Table of Content
1. conviction based on insufficient evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. witnesses contradicted their earlier statements. (Para 2 , 8 , 18)
3. credibility of prosecution's case questioned. (Para 6 , 10 , 20)
4. absence of corroborative evidence led to acquittal. (Para 27 , 32)

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12-11-1994 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, in Sessions Trial No. 190/93, whereby and whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge while acquitting co - accused Madan Gopal, after holding the appellants guilty for commission of culpable homicide amounting to murder of Rameshwar Soni in sharing common intention by using firearm without license, convicted appellant Baldev under S.302 of the IPC, 25 & 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to undergo RI for three years, respectively. The trial Court has also convicted co - accused Gopal, who has been released after serving sentence, under S.324 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo RI for three years.

2. Conviction is impugned on the ground that without any iota of evidence, the trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellants, and thereby committed illegality.

3. As per case of the prosecution, on the fategul day of 29-4-1993 at about 7 p.m. Jatta (PW 1) went to the house of co - appellant Gopal and demanded liquor from Gopal which Gopal denied on which Jatta threatened Gopal that he will lodged report whereupon Gopal went inside his house and came with axe and assaulted Jatta by axe over back of his head. Jatta snatched axe from Gopal and called his brother Rameshwar (since deceased), at that time appellant Baldev came by cycle along with one Madan, Baldev was having country made pistol and he shot fire by country made pistol upon Rameshwar as of result Rameshwar fell down and died as a result of pistol shot injury. Gopal assaulted Bhula (PW 3) and caused injury. Jatta (PW 1) went to the police station and lodged FIR vide Ex. P - 1. Merg intimation was recorded vide Ex. P - 22. The investigating officer left for the scene of occurrence and after summoning the witnesses vide Ex. P - 2 prepared inquest over the dead body of deceased Rameshwar vide Ex. P - 3. Blood stained and plain soil were recovered from the spot vide Ex. P -

4. One blood stained wooden piece was seized from Bhula vide Ex. P - 5. Blood stained axe was seized from Jatta (PW 1) vide Ex. P - 6. Blood stained cloth of Jatta was seized from Jatta vide Ex. P - 7. One cycle lying in the field of Maniram was seized vide Ex. P - 8. Blood stained baniyan was seized from accused Gopal vide Ex. P - 9. Blood stained shirt was seized from appellant Baldev vide Ex. P - 10. Acquitted co - accused Madan made discloser statement of stick vide Ex. P - 11 and same was recovered at his instance vide Ex. P - 12. Sealed clothes of the deceased, metal piece, plastic and synthetic material found in the body of the deceased were seized vide Ex. P - 13. Dead body of the deceased was sent for autopsy to Assistant Surgeon, Community Helath Centre, Rajpur. Dr. P. L. Verma (PW 8) conducted autopsy vide Ex. P - 14 and found following injuries: -(1) Dry blood over both cheeks, neck, ear and nose.(2) Lacerated wound of 2 ½ c.m. x 2 ½ c.m. over right scapular region.(3) Fracture of scapular bone of 2 ½ c.m. x 2 ½ c.m. whole was also noticed in the bone.(4) Fracture of 4th 5th ribs and fracture of 4th & 5th vertebra.(5) Lacerated injury over right lungs.(6) Lacerated wound over sterno clavicular region of 3 c.m. x 3 c.m.(7) One broken plastic cover, three synthetic materials found inside the body.(8) One heavy metal piece like bullet in disturbed shape found in internal part of the body. Cause of death was gut shot injury, mode of death was syncope and death was homicidal in nature. Dr. P. L. Verma (PW 8) has also examined injured Jatta (PW 1) vide Ex. P - 15 and found one lacerated wound over scalp of 1 c.m. x ½ c.m. H



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top