CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Gunaram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction is based on eyewitness accounts and medical examination. (Para 1 , 2 , 20) |
| 2. the appellant’s arguments regarding witness reliability were countered by legal standards. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. consistency in eyewitness accounts supports prosecution. (Para 5 , 8 , 18 , 22) |
| 4. conviction upheld based on sufficient evidence. (Para 24) |
1\. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 19th January, 1996 passed in Session Trial No. 147/1995 by the Second Additional Session Judge, Bilaspur. By the impugned judgment, accused / appellant Gunaram has been convicted under S.302 and S.325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and rigorous imprisonment for three years, respectively. Both the sentences are directed to run consecutively.
2. The facts, briefly stated, are as under:
On 1-10-1994, at about 8.00 a. m., deceased Sitaram and Narbada Prasad alias Lallu (PW - 2) were going to Gadhiyakhar. At the same time, the appellant was returning from Gadhiyakhar. He was armed with an iron Chatwar. When the deceased and Narbada Prasad alias Lallu (PW - 2) reached near the appellant, the appellant assaulted on the head of the deceased with th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.