CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A. K. Tripathi, J
Birendranath Garewal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summarizes the appeal process and initial charges. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on the reliability of prosecution witnesses. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of the evidence regarding dowry harassment. (Para 5 , 16) |
| 4. court's conclusion on the insufficiency of evidence. (Para 25) |
| 5. final ruling of acquittal. (Para 26) |
1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 10-6-1996 passed by 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions Trial No. 494/1993. By the impugned judgment, accused / appellant Birendranath Garewal has been convicted under S.304 - B and 498 - A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and two years, respectively. Both the sentences are directed to run concurrently. By the said judgment, the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted other accused persons Kedarnath Garewal and Jitendra Garewal of the charges framed against them.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under :
Deceased Anita was married with the appellant on 4-5-1992. After one year of the marriage, when she came to her maternal house, she told her mother that the appellant used to beat and ill - treat her. He used to come home in drunken




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.