SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 104

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Atal Shrivastava v. Devprasad and Another


Table of Content
1. validity and ownership of ancestral land through transfers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court upheld trial court's findings and evidence analysis. (Para 4 , 5 , 8 , 26)
3. burden of proof lies with the plaintiff regarding the title. (Para 6 , 7 , 22 , 23)

1. The instant appeal, preferred by the plaintiff, under S.96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is directed against judgment and decree dated 5-2-2011 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 19 - A / 2009, whereby the suit, filed by the plaintiff / appellant for declaration of title and permanent injunction, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts, as projected by the plaintiff / appellant, are that Manohar, son of Mangat Suryavanshi was owner of a piece of land bearing Khasra No. 259/3, are 0.50 acre (0.202 hectare), situated at Village Mangla, P. H. No. 21, R. I. Circle Bilaspur (henceforth 'the suit land'), which was subsequently purchased by Smt. Jotkunwar, widow of Nandram Satnami, resident of Sakri through a registered sale - deed dated 21-3-1975 and as such she became owner of the suit land and came into possession thereof. During her lifetime, she gifted the suit land to Smt. Yashoda Bai







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top