SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 221

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
N/A, N/A
Appellant insurance company – Appellant
Versus
Claimants / dependants of the deceased – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N/A
For the Respondents: N/A

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant insurance company against the impugned award dated 10.5.2007, passed by the First Additional M.A.C.T., Bilaspur in Claim Case No. 147 of 2006, awarding a sum of Rs. 3,74,500 as compensation along with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of the application, holding the non - applicants, including the appellant insurance company, as jointly and severally liable to pay the amount of compensation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 8.3.2006 deceased Bahoranlal Suryavanshi along with two other persons was going by bullock cart to Aramill. At that time Hywa truck, bearing registration No. CG 10 - A 9938, which was being driven in a rash and negligent manner by the non - applicant No. 1, dashed the bullock cart. As a result °f this accident Bahoranlal Suryavanshi sustained grievous injuries and during the treatment on 9.3.2006 at about 10 p.m. he succumbed to the injuries.

3. The claimants / dependants of the deceased filed a claim case under S.166 of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1988 claiming total compensation of Rs. 4,66,000.

4. The learned Claims Tribunal having regard to the facts situation and the evidence on record


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top