Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.
Dinesh Kumar Kannoje – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final judgment and acquittal of the appellant. (Para 1 , 31) |
| 2. outline of the factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding the credibility of evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's analysis on evidence and demand. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 5. rebuttal of presumption by the accused and necessity for concrete evidence. (Para 14 , 20 , 30) |
| 6. principles governing the requirement of demand and acceptance in bribery cases. (Para 15 , 18 , 19) |
1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 31-10-1998 passed by Special Judge, Raipur in Special Case No. 1/1993. By the impugned judgment, accused / appellant Dinesh Kumar Kannoje has been convicted under S.161 of the Indian Penal Code and S.5(1)(d) read with S.5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (henceforth 'the Act, 1947' ) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months, respectively. Both the jail sentences are directed to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
