SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 229

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
*I. M. Quddusi, G. Minhajuddin, JJ.
appellant insurance company – Appellant
Versus
claimants – Respondent


Table of Content
1. the appeal arises from a tribunal's award of compensation for a motor accident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. discussion on the accident's circumstances and the driver's negligence. (Para 4 , 10)
3. interpretation of 'public place' in context of liability under the motor vehicles act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. assessment of damages and appropriate deductions based on dependents. (Para 11 , 12)
5. final ruling on the modified compensation awarded to claimants. (Para 13)

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant insurance company against the award dated 26.8.2011 passed by the learned Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bilaspur (CG) (for short, 'the Claims Tribunal') in Claim Case No. 137 of 2011.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 9.6.2009 at about 5 p.m. the respondent No. 6 reversed the truck bearing registration No. CG 04 - J 1411 in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against Dwarika Prasad Kashyap, who was at that time working in the Motor Mechanic Garage, Bilaspur, as a result of which he suffered grievous injuries on his body. He was admitted in CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur where he died while undergoing treatment. The claimants, being the dependan


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top