Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
K.K. Nagendra, J
Ramnath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal revision context and prior judgments (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. main issues surrounding the credibility of the act (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. legal definitions and necessary elements for conviction (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court’s determination on whether the act constituted cheating (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final judgment and acquittal of the applicant (Para 15) |
1. The criminal revision has been filed under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 28-2-2001 passed by Sessions Judge, Surguja (Ambikapur) in Cr. A. No. 2/2000, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10-1-2000 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur in Cr. Case No. 2338/87, has been affirmed, dismissing the appeal of the applicant.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that pursuant to the warrant of arrest issued against non - applicant - Karia under S.107, S.116(3) of CrPC in Misc. Cr. Case No. 564/87 pending in the Court of SDM, Ambikapur, non - applicant - Karia appeared before the Court of SDM, Ambikapur. Applicant - Ramnath had come to the Court along with non - applicant - Karia for the purpose of his bail. The applicant went to the re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
