Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
A.P. Sahi, J
Ratan Kumar Jain and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. requirements for mining operations in forested areas. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the necessity of prior governmental approval for non-forest activities. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. the consequences of unauthorized tree felling. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. the importance of lawfulness in achieving public good. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. final observations affirm conditions for the secl and rights of the petitioner. (Para 43 , 44) |
1. We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, but borrow it from our children is an old proverb. It is for us how we give back the mother earth to our children. These cases are, in a way, reminder of that saying and are for the following reliefs: v Writ Petition No. 4520 of 2000 (the first WP) is to restrain the South Eastern Coalfield Limited (the SECL) from illegally mining the reserved forest area, felling the trees, and to prosecute the culprits for not taking any action;
" Writ Petition (C) No. 5354 of 2009 (the second WP) is against the order of the Additional Collector Manendragarh, District Korea (CG), dated 22-8-2009 in revenue case No. 3A - 62/2006-2007, rejecting the objection of Shri Ratan Kumar Jain (the petitioner) against the permiss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
