CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.
Darbar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 5-8-2004 passed by 9th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 459/2003. By the impugned judgment, appellant Darbar Singh has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently and co - accused Smt. Jamunabai and Manohar have been acquitted of the charges framed against them:
Conviction Under S.498 - A IPC Sentence Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo
Under S.306 IPC rigorous imprisonment for 1 month. Rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs. 700/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 months.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under ; -
Appellant Darbar Singh is husband, acquitted accused Jamunabai is mother - in - law and Manohar is jeth (brother - in - law) of deceased Indirabai. Marriage of deceased Indirabai was solemnized with the appellant 3 months prior to the date of incident. Deceased Indirabai committed suicide in her matrimonial house by pouring kerosene on her person and setting herself on fire on 13-8-200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.