SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 269

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Radhe Shyam Sharma, J.
Darbar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Sessions Trial No. 459/2003



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri N. K. Chatterjee
For the Respondents: Shri Sushil Dubey

For conviction under IPC Sections 306 and 498A, evidence must establish a direct link between cruelty and instigation to commit suicide. Conviction under S.306 may not stand if proof of instigation is lacking while S.498A charges may be upheld.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306 and 498A - Conviction and sentencing of appellant for abetment of suicide and dowry harassment - Conviction under S.306 set aside; upheld under S.498A - Cruelty must drive woman to suicide or cause serious injury - Case hinges on evidence of mental torture leading to suicide - Evidence insufficient to establish S.306, but sufficient for S.498A - Enhanced fine imposed. (Paras 31, 35)

(B) Dying Declaration - Can be relied upon even if recorded by a police officer - Must inspire confidence in the Court. (Para 26)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted following the suicide of his wife, primarily regarding dowry harassment. Key witnesses reported the deceased's mental and physical abuse leading up to her death.

Findings of Court:
The Court found the charge under S.306 not proven but upheld the conviction for S.498A based on sufficient evidence of cruelty and harassment. The jail sentence was mitigated to time served, with a fine increase.

Issues: The Court explored whether the actions constituted instigation leading to suicide and if sufficient evidence substantiated claims of cruelty regarding dowry demands.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for tangible evidence of cruelty directly linked to the suicide, dismissing the charge under S.306 while affirming the upheld conviction under S.498A due to established mental and physical abuse leading to disrupting the deceased's mental state.

Result: Appeal partly allowed, conviction under S.306 set aside, upheld under S.498A.

Table of Content
1. conviction based on mental and physical abuse resulting in suicide. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by prosecution and defense. (Para 4 , 5)
3. explains necessary evidence for establishing cruelty under ipc. (Para 10 , 19 , 21)
4. conviction under s.306 not sustained, but s.498a upheld. (Para 31)
5. final ruling on appeal outcomes and sentence adjustments. (Para 34 , 35)

1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 5-8-2004 passed by 9th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 459/2003. By the impugned judgment, appellant Darbar Singh has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently and co - accused Smt. Jamunabai and Manohar have been acquitted of the charges framed against them:
Conviction Under S.498 - A IPC Sentence Rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo
Under S.306 IPC rigorous imprisonment for 1 month. Rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs. 700/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 months.


2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under ; -
Appellant Darbar Singh is husband, acquitted accused Jamunabai is mother - in - law and Manohar is jeth (brother - in - law) of deceased Indirabai. Marriage of deceased Indirabai was solemnized with the appellant 3 months prior to the date of incident. Deceased Indirabai committed suicide in her matrimonial house by pouring kerosene on her person and setting herself on fire on 13-8-2003. Gajpal Singh (PW - 1, father of the deceased) had given sufficient dowry including TV and jewellery at the time of marriage. Within a few days after the marriage, the appellant and acquitted accused persons started ill - treating the deceased and caused severe mental torture to her telling that she had brought substandard quality of TV and such articles should be taken back. Instead of TV they demanded Rs. 10,000/-. Deceased Indirabai narrated the incident to her father Gajpal Singh (PW - 1), brother Ravi Singh (PW - 2) and other members of the family. The appellant wanted Rs. 10,000/- from them and therefor physical and mental torture was given by the appellant and other acquitted accused persons to the deceased, as a result of which, the deceased committed suicide by pouring kerosene on her person and setting herself on fire. Deceased Indirabai was admitted in CIMS, Bitaspur where she died on the same day at about 9:05 p.m. Intimation was sent to Police Station Kotwali, Bilaspur where merg intimation (Ex. P - 13) at 0/2003 was registered. Investigating Officer reached CIMS hospital, gave notice (Ex. P - 3) to Panchas and prepared inquest (Ex. P - 2) on the dead body of the deceased. The dead body of the deceased was sent to CIMS, Bilaspur for post mortem examination vide Ex. P - 6. Dr. A. K. Shukla (PW - 8) conducted post
mortem examination on the deadbody of the deceased along with Rs. Smt. K. Mittal and they gave their report (Ex. P46), in which, they mentioned that the cause of the death was complicating extensive burn.
In further investigation, panchnama (Ex. P - 1) of the place of occurrence was prepared. A burnt stick of match - box, a match - box and pieces of burnt saree were seized from the place of occurrence vide Ex. P - 5. Site map (Ex.P - 9) was prepared. First Information Report (Ex. P - 8) was registered in Police Station Kotwali, Bilaspur. Thereafter, regular First Information Report (Ex. P - 7) was registered in Police Station Masturi.
After completion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed against the appellant in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bilaspur, who, in turn, committed the case to the Court of Session, Bilaspur, from where, it was received on transfer by the 9th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur, who conducted the trial and convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned above and acquitted co - accus









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top