SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 274

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
R. C. Sharma, J
Ajay – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Sessions Trial No. 26/2002



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Shri Sunil Sahu
For the Respondent: Smt. Madhunisha Singh

Conviction under IPC Section 307 requires demonstrating intent and overt act; familial relationships of witnesses do not inherently discredit their testimony.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307 - Attempt to murder - Conviction based on eyewitness testimony and medical evidence of 60% burn injuries on the victim - Evidence corroborated by family witnesses establishes ill-treatment and intent to kill - No infirmity in the trial court’s finding. (Paras 1, 22, 24)

(B) Evidence - Credibility of family witnesses - Court reiterates that relationship does not inherently discredit witness credibility; must assess evidence contextually. (Paras 12, 13, 15)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for attempting to murder his wife by pouring kerosene and setting her on fire after an abusive marriage with previous dowry demands.

Findings of Court:
The appellant's actions showed intent to kill, supported by consistent testimonies and medical evidence of severe burns.

Issues: Whether the evidence of family members can be trusted without being inherently biased against the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld that the evidence of interested witnesses can be credible and reliable under certain circumstances and should not be discarded solely due to familial ties.

Result: The appeal is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. conviction is based on credible eyewitness testimony. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. family witness credibility must be assessed contextually. (Para 12 , 13 , 15)
3. intent to murder established, supporting conviction under ipc. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24)

1. This appeal is directed against judgment dated 9-8-2004 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in Sessions Trial No. 26/2002. By the impugned judgment, accused / appellant Ajay has been convicted under S.307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and co - accused persons Vinay Kumar, Smt. Rama Bhattacharya, Vilas alias Debu and Kumari Gauri have been acquitted of the charges framed against them.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is as under :
Marriage of Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) was solemnized with the appellant on 26-6-2000. After the marriage, Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) was residing with her husband (the appellant), father - in - law and mother - in - law in her matrimonial house. Acquitted co - accused Vinay Kumar is father - in - law, Smt. Rama Bhattacharya is mother - in - law, Vilas alias Debu is Dewar (brother - in - law) and Kumari Gauri is Nand (sister - in - law) of Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4). Sufficient dowry was given in the marriage by S. N. Goswami (PW - 2), (father of Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya). The appellant and acquitted co - accused persons ill - treated Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) and caused severe mentally torture to her. Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) narrated the incident to her brother and father. On 19-6-2001, Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) prepared tea in the room. The appellant came there and poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. The appellant took Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) to Community Health Centre, Dongargarh. Dr. A. K. Tamrakar (PW - 7) examined her and gave his report (Ex. P - 12), in which, he found that Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) had sustained burn injuries about 60%. He referred her to Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, Sector 9, Bhilai for further treatment. Dr. Mamta Sikoria (PW - 11) admitted Smt. Shikha Bhattacharya (PW - 4) in Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital, gave treatment to her and gave her report (Ex. P - 16). S. N. Goswami (PW - 2) made written complaint (Ex. P - 7) to the Superintendent of Police, Rajanandgaon. S. R. Diwan (PW - 14) investigated the matter and sent his report (Ex. P - 21) to the S. P. Rajnandgaon and thereafter regular First Information Report (Ex. P - 22) was recorded in Police Station Dongargarh. In further investigation, Exts. P - 2 to P - 6, i.e., case memo were seized vide Ex. P - 1. Pieces of burnt saree, blouse and stove were seized from the place of occurrence vide Ex. P - 9. Bed Head Ticket was also seized vide Ex. P - 15. Godrej Almirah, dressing table, Gadda and Thali etc. were also seized vide Ex. P - 19. Spot map (Ex. P - 18) was also prepared.
After completion of the investigation, charge - sheet was filed against the appellant and acquitted co - accused persons in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dongargarh, who, in turn, committed the case to the Court of Session, Rajnandgaon, from where, it was received on transfer by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon, who, conducted the trial and convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned above and acquitted the co - accused persons. Learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge framed charges of offence under S.498 - A and 307, IPC against the appellant and under S.498 - A, IPC against the acquitted co - accused persons. The appellant and the acquitted co - accused persons have been acquitted of charges under S.498 - A, IPC. The appellant has been convicted under S.307, IPC and sentenced as mentioned above.


3. Shri. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel for the appellant argued that S. N. Goswami (PW - 2) is father, Smt. Le





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top