Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
N.K. Chandravanshi, J
Gajanand Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cancellation of auction due to lack of competitive bids. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments focused on contract completion and legality of cancellation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's observations on auction legitimacy and market price. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. ratio on contract finalization and statutory requirements. (Para 22 , 24) |
| 5. final conclusion upholding cancellation based on public interest. (Para 31 , 32) |
1. W. P. (C) Nos. 1602, 1585, 1657, 1658, 1659, 1660, 1661, 1662, 1663, 1664, 1665, 1666, 1667, 1668, 1669, 1670, 1671, 1672, 1673, 1690, 1691, 1712, 1713, 1714, 1715, 1716, 1717, 1718, 1719, 1720, 1721, 1722, 1723, 1724, 1725, 1726, 1727, 1728, 1831, 1839, 1842, 1843, 1844, 1845, 1846, 1862 and 1863 of 2012, involve common facts as well as one and the same question of law, require to be decided by common order.
2. The cause of action, in all these petitions, arose from the order dated 30-8-2012, whereby auction of 56 shops of Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Durg (for short 'the Samiti'), was cancelled.
3. As all the facts are common, the facts and documents referred in the first petition, i.e. W. P. (C) No. 1602/2012, are being taken for c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
