Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
undefined, undefined
Ram Ashra Nammu Sahu v. Chandrika Prasad and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case involving an oral contract for land sale. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the dismissal of the suit on limitation grounds. (Para 5 , 11) |
| 3. court observations on the implications of time limits for contract performance. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. determination of the legality of the lower court's dismissal. (Para 15) |
| 5. final ruling regarding the appeal. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
1. This is plaintiff's second appeal filed under S.100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "the C. P. C.") against the judgment and decree dated 19th August, 1998 passed by the Additional District Judge, Dhamtari in Civil Appeal No. 31 - A / 1992 reversing the judgment and decree dated 19-8-1992 passed by the Civil Judge, Class - I, Dhamtari in Civil Suit No. 57 - A / 1986.
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of oral contract of sale with regard to suit land bearing Kh. No. 261/1 area 0.82 acres, said to be executed between the parties in the year 1981, for a sale consideration of Rs. 2603/-, out of which, Rs. 2200/- has been paid by him as earnest money.
3. It is the plaintiff's case that as per agreement, the sale deed was to be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
