Back
CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Yatindra Singh, C. J., Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.
Smt. Vani Rao – Appellant
Versus
State Government – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. validity of s.19-b of the act in question (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. challenging notices issued under s.19-b (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. arguments on legislative competence and principles (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. validity of notices and authentication process (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. court's conclusions on s.19-b and notices (Para 94) |
1. The main question involved in these writ petitions revolves around validity of S.19 - B of the Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (the Act). Among others, it empowers the State Government to remove, a Mayor of a municipal corporation.
2. THE FACTS
Bilaspur Development Authority (the BDA) acquired some land of one Shri Manohar Lal Raj (Shri Lal). In this regard, an agreement dated 21-7-1987 (the Agreement) was executed between them. It is said that:
• Under the agreement some money as well as some developed land was to be given to him; and
• After merger of the BDA with the Bilaspur Municipal Corporation (the Corporation) on 9-9-2002, it is to be done by the Corporation.
3. There was difference of opinion between the Municipal Commissioner of the Corporation (the Commissioner) and the elected Mayor of the Corporation, S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
