CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
State of M. P. v. Seetaram
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of prosecution under ipc and the electricity act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. interpretation of 'persons aggrieved' under the electricity act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. final ruling on the appeal and conclusion. (Para 16 , 18) |
1.The instant appeal is against the judgment and order dated 19.08.1996 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bemetara, District - Durg in Criminal Case No. 716/1991, whereby the respondent - accused has been acquitted of the charges under S.379 of IPC read with S.39 of the [The Indian] Electricity Act, 1910 (Act 9 of 1910), (for short 'the Electricity Act').
2. The respondent - accused was tried for the offence punishable under S.379 of IPC read with S.39 of the Electricity Act before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bemetara, District, Durg, wherein, he was acquitted on the ground that the prosecution should have been lodged by the Electrical Inspector and as such the prosecution at the behest of the Junior Engineer of the Electricity Board is a nullity, which could not have been done. In a result the accused were acquitted of the charges.
3. The brief facts of the prosecution case, is that, one Seetaram who was resident
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.