SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 97

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
State of M. P. v. Seetaram


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not stated
For the Respondents: Not stated

1.The instant appeal is against the judgment and order dated 19.08.1996 passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bemetara, District - Durg in Criminal Case No. 716/1991, whereby the respondent - accused has been acquitted of the charges under S.379 of IPC read with S.39 of the [The Indian] Electricity Act, 1910 (Act 9 of 1910), (for short 'the Electricity Act').

2. The respondent - accused was tried for the offence punishable under S.379 of IPC read with S.39 of the Electricity Act before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bemetara, District, Durg, wherein, he was acquitted on the ground that the prosecution should have been lodged by the Electrical Inspector and as such the prosecution at the behest of the Junior Engineer of the Electricity Board is a nullity, which could not have been done. In a result the accused were acquitted of the charges.

3. The brief facts of the prosecution case, is that, one Seetaram who was resident of village - Khamariya was using a electrical pump in his field by illegally obtaining the electricity line by hooking on to the wires and was using the pump. He therefore had committed a theft of Rs. 844/- towards the energy charges. It wa
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top