Govind Chauhan v. Sriram Sonboir - 2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 101

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 101

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
, J
Govind Chauhan v. Sriram Sonboir

Table of Content
1. the necessity of allowing simultaneous decisions on common questions of law. (Para 1 , 2)
2. description of the procedural history and facts surrounding the appellant's rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. the rejection of the application and its implications according to section 391. (Para 6 , 7)
4. discussion on the judicial discretion and importance of adducible evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. final order permitting the appellant to present additional evidence. (Para 13 , 14)

1. Since the common question of law arises in all the above revisions, therefore, they are decided simultaneously by this identical order.

2. These are the revisions under S.397 read with S.401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'), whereby the application moved by the appellant / accused under S.391 of the Code has been dismissed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Balod to take further evidence in the case.

3. The brief facts of the cases are that, the case under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act' ) was filed by the respondent / complainant against the applicant / accused before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dallirajhara,