Suruchi Bai Jangde v. Prabharani Jangde and Others

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 113

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K. Agarwal, J
Suruchi Bai Jangde v. Prabharani Jangde and Others

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:[Advocate for Petitioner]
For the Respondents:[Advocate for Respondent]

Table of Content
1. challenge to previous orders regarding no-confidence motion. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments around the validity and conduct of the no-confidence motion. (Para 7 , 8)
3. court's observation on the procedural adherence and effects. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
4. interpretation of relevant sections and rules regarding motions. (Para 11 , 13)

1. Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 01/08/2011 passed by the Additional Collector, Baloda Bazar, Distt. Raipur and the order dated 23/07/2013 passed by the Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur.

2. Vide order dated 1-8-2011 the Additional Collector had set aside the proceedings of No - Confidence Motion drawn against respondent No. 1 and in revision, the said order has been affirmed by the Commissioner vide order dated 23/07/2013.

3. Brief facts of the case are that in the year 2010 respondent No. 1 - Smt. Prabharani Jangde was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat - Lachchanpur, Tehsil - Bhatapara, Distt. Baloda Bazar. Said Gram Panchayat consists of one Sarpanch and 10 Panchas. On 18-5-2011, 9 Panchas including the petitioner submitted notice of No -