SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 117

CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Goutam Bhaduri, J
Vyas Narayan Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Gupta – Respondent


1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 30.9.2000 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baloda Bazaar, Raipur, (hereinafter referred to as ' the Trial Court'), in Criminal Case No. 364/1996.

2. By impugned judgment, the Trial Court had rejected the complaint filed by the petitioner under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ' the NI Act' ) holding that the Court at Baloda Bazaar does not have the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present dispute as raised by the complainant as according to the Trial Court the cause of action that arose in the instant case was outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Court at Baloda Bazaar.

3. Brief facts leading to the instant case are that the respondent Jagdish Gupta is a resident of Takhatpur and the complainant is a resident of Bhatapara. The respondent had some commercial transactions of purchase of agricultural products from the petitioner / complainant. Against the said transaction that was entered into between the parties, the respondent issued a cheque bearing No. 945881, dated 8.12.1995, amounting to Rs. 54,500/-, drawn on Punjab National Bank


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top